©2024 Stanford Medicine
Substrate Versus Trigger Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Not Recruiting
Trial ID: NCT02169037
Purpose
This is a prospective randomized study to assess the safety and efficacy of FIRM (Focal
Impulse and Rotor Modulation)-guided ablation for the treatment of symptomatic atrial
fibrillation (AF). The study hypothesis is that the efficacy of AF elimination at 1 year will
be higher by ablating patient-specific AF-sustaining rotors and focal sources by Focal
Impulse and Rotor Modulation (FIRM) compared to conventional ablation alone (wide-area PV
isolation).
Official Title
Substrate Ablation (Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation) Compared to Pulmonary Vein Isolation to Eliminate Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Stanford Investigator(s)
Paul J. Wang, MD
John R. and Ai Giak L. Singleton Director, Professor of Medicine (Cardiovascular Medicine) and, by courtesy, of Bioengineering
Eligibility
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
- male or female >21 years
- reported incidence of at least two documented episodes of symptomatic paroxysmal
atrial fibrillation (AF) during the three months preceding trial entry (at least 1
episode documented by 12-lead ECG or ECG rhythm strip)
- women without childbearing potential or women of childbearing potential who are not
pregnant per a serum HCG test
- refractory to at least one Class I or III anti-arrhythmic medications. Drug doses must
be therapeutic and stable
- willingness, ability and commitment to participate in baseline and follow-up
evaluations without participation in another clinical trial (unless documented
approval received from both sponsors)
- oral anticoagulation required for those subjects who have a score of two or more based
on the following criteria (CHAD score):
- Congestive heart failure (1 point)
- hypertention (1 point)
- age 75 years or older (2 points)
- diabetes (1 point)
- prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (2 points)
- vascular disease (1 point)
- age 65 years or older (1 point)
- sex category: female (1 point)
- patient is willing and able to remain on anti-coagulation therapy for a minimum of 3
months post procedure for all subjects, and potentially indefinitely post procedure if
the patient has CHAD score >or=2
- signed informed consent after a full discussion of the risks and benefits of both
therapy arms, and the concept of randomization
- NYHA Class 0,I, II stable on medical therapy for > 3months
- left atrial diameter
- LVEF >or=40%
- sustained AF during the procedure
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
- atrial fibrillation from a reversible cause (e.g., surgery, hyperthyroidism,
pericarditis)
- cardiac or thoracic surgery within the past 180 days
- AF secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease
- contraindication to Heparin
- Contraindication to Warfarin or other novel oral anticoagulants
- history of significant bleeding abnormalities
- history of significant blood clotting abnormalities, systemic thrombi or systemic
embolization
- ASD closure device, LAA closure device, prosthetic mitral or tricuspid valve
- atrial clot/thrombus on imaging such as on a trans-esophageal echocardiogram (TEE)
within 72 hours of the procedure
- intramural thrombus or other cardiac mass that may adversely effect catheter
introduction or manipulation
- significant pulmonary embolus within 6 months of enrollment
- acute illness or active systemic infection or sepsis that may ordinarily warrant
postponement of the procedure
- history of recent cerebrovascular disease (stroke or TIA) or systemic thromboembolism
within < 6 months
- NYHA classes III, IV
- heart failure that is not stable on medical therapy
- pulmonary edema, that may make planned anesthesia or sedation difficult
- stable/unstable angina or ongoing myocardial ischemia
- myocardial infarction (MI) within the past three months
- structural heart disease of clinical significance including:
- congenital heart disease where the abnormality or its correction prohibit or
increase the risk of ablation
- acquired heart disease that may increase risk of ablation, such as significant
ventricular septal defect post myocardial infarction
- rheumatic valve disease, since this produces a unique AF phenotype
- extreme left atrial enlargement (LA volume index > 60 ml/m2) in whom PVI has low
success and 55 mm baskets are too small for the atria
- cardiac transplantation or other cardiac surgery planned within the 12 month followup
period of the trial
- life expectancy less than 12 months (the followup period of the trial)
- significant pulmonary disease (e.g., COPD) or any other disease that significantly
increase the risk to the patient from sedation or anesthesia
- untreatable allergy to contrast media
- at time of ablation procedure, clinically significant abnormalities in serum
potassium, sodium, magnesium or other electrolytes that affect the suitability of the
patient for ablation at that time
Intervention(s):
procedure: FIRM Ablation
procedure: Conventional AF ablation with PVI
Not Recruiting
Contact Information
Stanford University
School of Medicine
300 Pasteur Drive
Stanford,
CA
94305