Crystalloid Liberal or Vasopressors Early Resuscitation in Sepsis

Not Recruiting

Trial ID: NCT03434028

Purpose

Multicenter, prospective, phase 3 randomized non-blinded interventional trial of fluid treatment strategies in the first 24 hours for patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. The aim of the study is to determine the impact of a restrictive fluids strategy (vasopressors first followed by rescue fluids) as compared to a liberal fluid strategy (fluids first followed by rescue vasopressors) on 90-day in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension.

Official Title

Crystalloid Liberal or Vasopressors Early Resuscitation in Sepsis

Stanford Investigator(s)

Angela Rogers
Angela Rogers

Associate Professor of Medicine (Pulmonary and Critical Care)

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

* Age ≥ 18 years
* A suspected or confirmed infection (broadly defined by administration or planned administration of antibiotics)
* Sepsis-induced hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure \< 100 mmHg or MAP \< 65 mmHg after a minimum of at least 1 liter of fluid (\*Fluids inclusive of pre-hospital fluids; blood pressure must be below any known or reported pre-morbid baseline).

Exclusion Criteria:

* More than 4 hours elapsed since meeting inclusion criteria or 24 hours elapsed since admission to the hospital
* Patient already received 3 liters of intravenous fluid (includes prehospital volumes)
* Unable to obtain informed consent
* Known pregnancy
* Hypotension suspected to be due to non-sepsis cause (e.g. hemorrhagic shock)
* Blood pressure is at known or reported baseline level
* Severe Volume Depletion from an acute condition other than sepsis. In the judgment of the treating physician, the patient has an acute condition other than sepsis causing (or indicative) of \*severe volume depletion; Examples include: Diabetic ketoacidosis, high volume vomiting or diarrhea, hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state, and nonexertional hyperthermia (heat stroke); severe is defined by the need for substantial intravenous fluid administration as part of routine clinical care
* Pulmonary edema or clinical signs of new fluid overload (e.g. bilateral crackles, new oxygen requirement, new peripheral edema, fluid overload on chest x-ray)
* Treating physician unwilling to give additional fluids as directed by the liberal protocol
* Treating physician unwilling to use vasopressors as directed by the restrictive protocol.
* Current or imminent decision to withhold most/all life-sustaining treatment; this does not exclude those patients committed to full support except cardiopulmonary resuscitation
* Immediate surgical intervention planned such that study procedures could not be followed
* Prior enrollment in this study

Intervention(s):

drug: Early Vasopressors

other: Early Fluids

Not Recruiting

Contact Information

Stanford University
School of Medicine
300 Pasteur Drive
Stanford, CA 94305